前两天取消了XEN-HVM的那款YardVPS,又买了一个月付的XEN-PV的VPS。虽然个人觉得无论是ping值还是I/O都不错,但是鉴于网上恶评如潮,对于未来是否长期持有还是有点动摇。于是,为了有一个客观的判断,我运行了一次UnixBench测试,结果居然惨不忍睹:
Benchmark Run: Fri Oct 19 2012 21:30:33 - 21:58:29 1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 9800785.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 2117.3 MWIPS (10.2 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 1857.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 358208.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 100224.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 947718.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 588652.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 85276.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 3431.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 3021.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 416.0 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 515420.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 9800785.4 839.8 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2117.3 385.0 Execl Throughput 43.0 1857.6 432.0 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 358208.9 904.6 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 100224.3 605.6 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 947718.1 1634.0 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 588652.2 473.2 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 85276.4 213.2 Process Creation 126.0 3431.5 272.3 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 3021.4 712.6 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 416.0 693.3 System Call Overhead 15000.0 515420.2 343.6 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 537.6
相比Kiloserve和Hostigation的1000+的高分,这个分数实在是看不下去。而且YardVPS不适合做SSH Tunnel和PPTP,速度很慢。
Fairwell, YardVPS.
本文为悠然居(https://wordpress.youran.me/)的原创文章,转载请注明出处!
Yard太垃圾了,别用